Press "Enter" to skip to content

A syntax of substance by David Adger

By David Adger

In A Syntax of Substance, David Adger proposes a brand new method of word constitution that eschews practical heads and labels constructions exocentrically. His notion at the same time simplifies the syntactic procedure and restricts the diversity of attainable buildings, ruling out the ever present (remnant) roll-up derivations and forcing a separation of arguments from their obvious heads. This new method has a few empirical outcomes, which Adger explores within the area of relational nominals throughout various language households, together with Germanic, Romance, Celtic, Polynesian, and Semitic. He indicates that the relationality of such nouns as hand, edge, or mother -- which appear to have as a part of their that means a relation among components -- is de facto a part of the syntactic illustration during which they're used instead of an inherent a part of their that means. This empirical end result follows without delay from the recent syntactic approach, as does a unique research of PP enhances to nouns and possessors. Given this, he argues that nouns can, regularly, be considered easily necessities of substance, differentiating them from real predicates.

A Syntax of Substance bargains an cutting edge contribution to debates in theoretical syntax in regards to the nature of syntactic representations and the way they hook up with semantic interpretation and linear order.

Show description

Read Online or Download A syntax of substance PDF

Similar grammar books

Fate, Time, and Language: An Essay on Free Will

In 1962, the thinker Richard Taylor used six ordinarily authorised presuppositions to indicate that people don't have any regulate over the long run. David Foster Wallace not just took factor with Taylor's approach, which, in keeping with him, scrambled the kinfolk of good judgment, language, and the actual global, but additionally famous a semantic trick on the center of Taylor's argument.

Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory)

Just about all languages have a few grammatical skill for categorizing nouns. This ebook offers a accomplished and unique research of noun categorization units around the world. it is going to curiosity typologists, these operating within the fields of morphosyntactic edition and lexical semantics, in addition to anthropologists and all different students attracted to the mechanisms of human cognition.

Additional resources for A syntax of substance

Example text

Movement of Lilly to [Spec, T] above) is legitimate. We derive, then, the consequence that only i-specifiers can move and that apparent cases of movement of a part of an extended projection must rather be movement of an i-specifier in an extended projection started by some root where the upper part of that extended projection and the upper part of the extended projection of the apparently moved constituent are identical. These definitions of i-specifier and i-complement are steadfastly nonstructural and contrast with the usual derivational definitions (First Merge vs.

To create a structure where v* has both a complement and a specifier, there simply have to be, in Λ, two LTFs: (40) Λ = {. . , , , . . } maps from labels in one extended projection to another, whereas follows the extended projection of V. It follows from these, and from the unified definition of binary labels, that in a binary Merge structure, v* can label a structure that immediately contains both V and D. More concretely, a derivation of Lilly jumps (assuming, possibly counterfactually, that Lilly is a single lexical item) is:11 √ √ (41) a.

28 Chapter 2 A major reason that labeling is generally taken to be endocentric is inclusiveness (Chomsky 1995b). However, whether we label structure in the way I have proposed or we label structure by drawing heads from a functional lexicon is actually immaterial. Inclusiveness would be trivially satisfied if we were to build all syntactic structure into lexical items and allow that structure to project via simple syntactic processes; it is not the lexical nature of the source of information that is crucial to inclusiveness: inclusiveness effectively bars the introduction of descriptive technology during the course of a derivation (see Chomsky 2008) minimizing the addition of information to the derivation.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.85 of 5 – based on 37 votes